[Pm-utils] pm-utils-1.3.0 has been released

Martin Pitt martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Wed Mar 17 09:54:41 PDT 2010


Michael Biebl [2010-03-17 17:23 +0100]:
> I'm all for that, because I think the import process also has the
> potential risk of breaking something.
> Importing it once into pm-utils, then carefully checking if the
> imported database looks sane,  and adding/modifying enties looks like
> a much more robust solution to me.

+1, FWIW.

> I would actually prefer, if we just shipped the quirks within the
> pm-utils tarball.
> Looking at the git branch, it looks like Victor wants to keep them in
> a separate tarball, even if they are in the same git repo.

Victor, did that happen more or less by accident, or was it a
conscious decision? I could envision a separate git tree for being
able to give more people commit privileges to the quirks git, while
keeping the privileges for pm-utils itself relatively tight?

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)


More information about the hal mailing list