[immodule-qt] Completing comments and documents

[YamaKen]

At Wed, 4 Aug 2004 03:06:38 +0100,
liucougar at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:58:03 +0900, YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > I can understand your thought about simplicity. Yes,
> > imtermediate Qt keyevent is less straightforward for SCIM
> > because keycodes of SCIM is based on X keycodes. So your
> > implementation is reasonable because there is no other
> > platforms are available for immodule except for X11.
> you are right, but in fact, I just fixed the problem which prevents
> scim-qtimm from normal functioning without x11EventFilter.

I've understood that some difficulties are existing without
x11EventFilter. I'll look at your code later.

> > But what I want to know is whether 'faster' is actually sensible
> > by human or not. If sensible, it may be indicating
> > implementation error of our code. Otherwise, the performance
> > difference is not important.
> In my box, I didn't notice any differences ;)

Okay, I'm remembering only 'normal functioning without
x11EventFilter' as a requirement.

-------------------------------
YamaKen  yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp