[Intel-gfx] Proposal for rules for maintaining the 2.7 branch
cworth at cworth.org
Thu Mar 19 11:13:10 PDT 2009
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:28 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Carl Worth at 11/03/09 23:04 did gyre and gimble:
> > Not cherry-picked (not obviously a bug fix):
> > commit 73db44e7ac524e84e5f0fda2d60069a9e954ad1b
> > Author: Kristian Høgsberg <krh at redhat.com>
> > Drop Legacy3D option, only use fixed texture space with non-gem.
> Ironically, this one may indeed be a bug fix that /should/ be
> cherry-picked ;)
Heh. Thanks for the note. I've cherry-picked this and pushed out several
other fixes on the 2.7 branch.
It seems that authors are nicely marking most fixes explicitly as fixes.
Thanks so much!
We're down to just for high-priority bugs left on our bug tracker[*],
(and I think Eric says he's got one of his fixed already). Thanks to
everyone working to ensure that 2.7 will be an excellent release.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20090319/f52d05d7/attachment.pgp
More information about the Intel-gfx