[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Introduce for_each_ring() macro

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri May 11 11:26:11 CEST 2012


On Fri, 11 May 2012 11:00:12 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:39:32PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Sneaky way to get rid of the warning you never liked... I won't forget
> > this.
> 
> I concur that killing that warnings is sneaky ;-) Can't we just keep them
> - the ring->obj check should do the right thing? Or what exactly do I
> miss?

Other than I'm not a fan of those warnings; completely in the wrong
spot. If you want a warning that i915_gpu_idle is not doing its job
even in the face of a wedged GPU (so in fact i915_gem_reset failing),
it would be better to place those warnings inside i915_gpu_idle.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list