[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorder semaphore deadlock check

Mika Kuoppala mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Fri Jun 6 12:04:12 CEST 2014


Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> If a semaphore is waiting on another ring, which in turn happens to be
> waiting on the first ring, but that second semaphore has been signalled,
> we will be able to kick the second ring and so can treat the first ring
> as a valid WAIT and not as HUNG.
>
> v2: Be paranoid and cap the potential recursion depth whilst visiting
> the semaphore signallers. (Mika)
>
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54226
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75502
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> ---

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>

>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index a702303eab08..2974698f8f27 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -2831,10 +2831,14 @@ static int semaphore_passed(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>  	struct intel_engine_cs *signaller;
>  	u32 seqno, ctl;
>  
> -	ring->hangcheck.deadlock = true;
> +	ring->hangcheck.deadlock++;
>  
>  	signaller = semaphore_waits_for(ring, &seqno);
> -	if (signaller == NULL || signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
> +	if (signaller == NULL)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/* Prevent pathological recursion due to driver bugs */
> +	if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock >= I915_NUM_RINGS)
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	/* cursory check for an unkickable deadlock */
> @@ -2842,7 +2846,13 @@ static int semaphore_passed(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>  	if (ctl & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE && semaphore_passed(signaller) < 0)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	return i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno);
> +	if (i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno))
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void semaphore_clear_deadlocks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -2851,7 +2861,7 @@ static void semaphore_clear_deadlocks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> -		ring->hangcheck.deadlock = false;
> +		ring->hangcheck.deadlock = 0;
>  }
>  
>  static enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 24357c597b54..31c2aab8ad2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct intel_ring_hangcheck {
>  	u32 seqno;
>  	int score;
>  	enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action action;
> -	bool deadlock;
> +	int deadlock;
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_ringbuffer {
> -- 
> 2.0.0



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list