[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorder semaphore deadlock check

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 06 Jun 2014, Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
>> If a semaphore is waiting on another ring, which in turn happens to be
>> waiting on the first ring, but that second semaphore has been signalled,
>> we will be able to kick the second ring and so can treat the first ring
>> as a valid WAIT and not as HUNG.
>>
>> v2: Be paranoid and cap the potential recursion depth whilst visiting
>> the semaphore signallers. (Mika)
>>
>> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54226
>> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75502
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>

Pushed to -fixes, thanks for the patch and review.

BR,
Jani.


>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |  2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index a702303eab08..2974698f8f27 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -2831,10 +2831,14 @@ static int semaphore_passed(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>>  	struct intel_engine_cs *signaller;
>>  	u32 seqno, ctl;
>>  
>> -	ring->hangcheck.deadlock = true;
>> +	ring->hangcheck.deadlock++;
>>  
>>  	signaller = semaphore_waits_for(ring, &seqno);
>> -	if (signaller == NULL || signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
>> +	if (signaller == NULL)
>> +		return -1;
>> +
>> +	/* Prevent pathological recursion due to driver bugs */
>> +	if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock >= I915_NUM_RINGS)
>>  		return -1;
>>  
>>  	/* cursory check for an unkickable deadlock */
>> @@ -2842,7 +2846,13 @@ static int semaphore_passed(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>>  	if (ctl & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE && semaphore_passed(signaller) < 0)
>>  		return -1;
>>  
>> -	return i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno);
>> +	if (i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
>> +		return -1;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void semaphore_clear_deadlocks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> @@ -2851,7 +2861,7 @@ static void semaphore_clear_deadlocks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>  	int i;
>>  
>>  	for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
>> -		ring->hangcheck.deadlock = false;
>> +		ring->hangcheck.deadlock = 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
>> index 24357c597b54..31c2aab8ad2c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
>> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct intel_ring_hangcheck {
>>  	u32 seqno;
>>  	int score;
>>  	enum intel_ring_hangcheck_action action;
>> -	bool deadlock;
>> +	int deadlock;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct intel_ringbuffer {
>> -- 
>> 2.0.0
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center