Small note on static analyzer, includes and build times...
albert.thuswaldner at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 03:28:13 PST 2012
Hi Stephan and Michael,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:03, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman at redhat.com> wrote:
> Nice approach. :) One remark re "Looking for .cxx files whose first
> include is not the header file...": I did not look into the articles you
> cite to see whether or why they advocate to include the corresponding header
> first in the .cxx file
According to the article that is the "most important guideline" taken
from this book:
Large Scale C++ Software Design by John Lakos
Makes one curious doesn't it? See if one can get hold of that book,
seems applicable for LO development.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 19:12, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at suse.com> wrote:
> Well - the pre-compiled headers would make -tons- of includes look
> useless anyway, though (I thought) we had decided to get rid of them as
> an under-maintained and bad job anyway ;-)
> Have you tried acting on this lot:
> Looking for useless includes in header files...
> AccessibleCell.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
> AccessibleCellBase.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
> AccessiblePreviewHeaderCell.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
> AccessibleTableBase.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
> And turning it into some patches to remove those headers & seeing if it
> compiles nicely ? if so it'd be nice to include that no doubt.
Sure, I can do that, I'll give it a spin and see if it pops...
More information about the LibreOffice