Unpublishing API post 4.0

Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat.com
Fri Feb 8 08:58:45 PST 2013


On 08/02/13 17:50, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 07:31 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> The hitch with announcing changes in micro releases is that the
>> lexicographical order of release numbers does not necessarily match the
>> chronological order of releases, so what does it mean if some change is
>> in "since LO 4.0.2" if LO 4.1 has been released before LO 4.0.2?
> 
> But we have the same problem with bug fixes, no?  We say this bug is 
> fixed in version x.y.z.  And we don't seem to suffer from this supposed 
> hypothetical conundrum.

the bugzilla whiteboard field tends to contain stuff like "target:4.1.0
target:4.0.1"

> If the need really arises, then we can easily list two versions anyway 
> i.e. (since 4.0.2/ 4.1, or something like that.

AFAIK extensions may specify a single "minimum version" and if they rely
on some newly introduced API then that may become messy if that API is
introduced at different points in different release branches.




More information about the LibreOffice mailing list