Reverts notification?

[Eike Rathke]

Hi Jan,

On Wednesday, 2014-09-17 14:07:36 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:

> > Also, if bug IDs are present in the revert summary, shouldn't the
> > corresponding bugs be set to REOPENED if they were already resolved or
> > closed?
> 
> I'd prefer not to do it, similarly as we don't close the bugs
> automagically when the commit has the bug id.
> 
> Sometimes there are partial reverts, sometimes there are 'Related'
> commits that can be not crucial for the bug itself.

You're right. Automatism might not be that helpful..

> The comment will go to the bug, so I'd prefer to leave the decision
> whether to re-open or not up to the QA guys, probably?

And hopefully it is assigned to the dev so s/he'll notice and act,
maybe..

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GPG key ID: 0x65632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Care about Free Software, support the FSFE https://fsfe.org/support/?erack
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20140917/91e99188/attachment-0001.sig>