[Mesa-dev] Tagging the 10.0 fork for git-describe

[Ian Romanick]

On 10/30/2013 01:01 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
> For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork
> point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or
> something similair. How do people feel about that?

I support this idea.

To avoid confusion with tags on the branch, I think the tag should
reflect where master is going.  mesa-10.next?  mesa-10.1-devel?  I'm
open to suggestions.  I'll update the version with the first patch after
the tag.

> It's been a long time since git-describe has given useful
> info. It's reported snb-magic for a looooooooong time.
> 
> $ git-describe
> snb-magic-18845-g103824d