[Mesa-dev] Tagging the 10.0 fork for git-describe

[Paul Berry]

On 30 October 2013 14:13, Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org> wrote:

> On 10/30/2013 01:01 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
> > For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork
> > point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or
> > something similair. How do people feel about that?
>
> I support this idea.
>
> To avoid confusion with tags on the branch, I think the tag should
> reflect where master is going.  mesa-10.next?  mesa-10.1-devel?  I'm
> open to suggestions.  I'll update the version with the first patch after
> the tag.
>

I like the sound of mesa-10.1-devel.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20131030/394f9412/attachment.html>