[OpenFontLibrary] browser / resolution compatibility for new site

[Ben Weiner]

Hi,

James Weiner wrote:
> But we can't exclude people purely because they use a dreadful browser 
> that ignores all agreed standards recommendations. To be honest in my 
> experience it should just be a case of straightening out a few of the 
> more common major bugs to achieve something that at least isn't all 
> broken and ugly. Hopefully this won't take more than a few hours to do.
Hope so!
> I also agree that validation would be a good thing, but this can't 
> happen until everyone has stopped fiddling with the html and we know 
> that we're in some sort of 'finished' state. I'll happily do the bug 
> fixing seeing as it's one of the parts of my day job and also I'm 
> familiar with the css what with having written it in the first place 
> ;o). Any chance we could try and get the site 'complete' in May? I 
> have some free time then that I can contribute.
Everyone who is contributing is quiet at the moment, but I expect to 
hear from Ed Trager soon about the tools he is working on. They affect 
the way users contribute files so they will affect the HTML. I doubt 
they will themeselves have any non-valid code though :-)

After that I think we will be ready to run through the site and look for 
validation errors.
>  Fontfreedom at aol.com: maybe one day you'd like to contribute rather 
> than just criticise?
I think, on aggregate, OFLB will benefit ;-)

Ben

-- 
Ben Weiner | http://readingtype.org.uk/about/contact.html