[OpenFontLibrary] Contribute logos for permissive font licenses on OFLBv2

[Dave Crossland]

So do we have consensus on these icons with the full acronym as text next to
it?

Only query I have remaining is if we keep all 3 as black or have different
colors?

On 31 Jul 2009, 10:26 AM, "Nicolas Spalinger" <nicolas_spalinger at sil.org>
wrote:

Dave Crossland wrote: > Full acronyms as text next to the icon is good, but
again, I think > you're ...
I see your point and you can probably understand where I'm coming from
on this but licensing clarity is really a major feature of the whole
library.

This might be a small illustration, and we already have full reports on
the page of the font itself but seeing as clearly as possible what
rights are granted or reserved right there in the list of fonts is also
needed.

We care about good licensing and about not hiding it to
users/contributors of the site, it's part of what makes this service
stand out compared to existing font portals. Especially as the webfonts
debate matures and recognizes the value of showing the right metadata to
users...

There are at least 4 well-known and widely used licenses starting with G...

-- Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer Debian/Ubuntu font teams /
OpenFontLibrary
http://planet.open-fonts.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/attachments/20090731/4f275d34/attachment.htm