[OpenFontLibrary] latest?

[Dave Crossland]

Hi,

Right, when MSIE supports WOFF it may become practically relevant. Until
then oflb ought to postpone support work, imo

Regards, Dave

On 21 Oct 2009, 2:48 PM, "Chris Lilley" <chris at w3.org> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, 2:17:41 PM, Nicolas wrote:


NM> Le Mer 21 octobre 2009 14:08, Ben Weiner a écrit :

>> Hi, >> Nicolas Spalinger wrote: >>> I think we also seriously need to
think about WOFF support ...
NM> Well, as the Mozilla article states plainly there are zero technical
NM> advantages to woff as compared to raw TTF/OTF as long as your apache is
NM> configured properly (with transparent compression, that any serious org
has
NM> been doing for years).

That is incorrect. HTTP byterange can be used to get the WOFF header and
decide which tables to selectively fetch. Thats a difference from gzip of
the whole thing.

But yes, one of the major advantages of WOFF is political; for-fee foundries
are apparently willing to license WOFF fonts for web use and TTF fonts for
print use.

NM> Since the OFLB has no problems distributing raw TTF/OTF files and
presumably
NM> is competent enough to use mod_deflate, I really do not see what would
be the
NM> point of pretending WOFF is any better. Let the foundries promote the
format
NM> they forced on the internet themselves.

Sigh.

The false "us and them" does not produce a workable solution.

And something does need to be done, since OFL forbids conversion to another
format without a rename fork; which is a PITA for folks who want to
reference a WOFF version of a free font.

NM> (I've really loved all the spin about woff that tried to imply woff was
NM> somehow necessary for web fonts, that systematically used libre fonts
like
NM> gentium or mgopen as examples when they can already be used directly as
plain
NM> font files with no degradation of user experience whatsoever).

They can be, if the user agent supports downloading of raw TTF/OTF files.
Some do , some don't, and some have said they never will. But have not said
that about WOFF.



--
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris at w3.org
 Technical Director, Interaction Domain
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openfontlibrary/attachments/20091021/bb6da4c0/attachment.htm