[OpenFontLibrary] license proliferation

[jon at rejon.org]

It means be careful to not create vanity licenses when possible. I
would consider SIL Open Font License vanity license, however,
licensing to me is mostly about it being a social contract/social
network with OFLB + SIL Open Font License.

In the future, I hope that SIL Open Font License could move to be
compatible with future CC licenses...that would make much more
sense...at the time of SIL Open Font License, CC said not into fonts.
I think that is diff. now...

Jon

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Barry Schwartz
<chemoelectric at chemoelectric.org> wrote:
> "jon at rejon.org" <jon at rejon.org> skribis:
>> http://joi.ito.com/weblog/2010/07/27/the-issue-of-li.html
>
> Does CC have a FAQ to explain what this article means to humans? :)
>
>



-- 
Jon Phillips
http://rejon.org/
http://fabricatorz.com/
http://status.net/
http://rejon.status.net + skype: kidproto
+1.415.830.3884 (sf/global)
+86.187.1003.9974 (china)