[pulseaudio-tickets] [Bug 90210] Pulse audio NOT USED multithreading

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90210

--- Comment #31 from Alessandro Ferri <alessandro.ferri at icloud.com> ---
(In reply to Mike Brady from comment #28)
> (In reply to Alessandro Ferri from comment #27)
> > > Thanks for these. No promises, at least for a couple of weeks...
> > 
> > Thanks again. I wait with impatience. If I can help you in some way, just
> > say the word.
> 
> Hi again. I spent a little time on this yesterday. It turns out that the
> pulseaudio back end uses the 'simple' pulseaudio interface. The problem with
> it is that the latency information it returns in the simple interface is
> very inaccurate. Shairport Sync monitors the latency every time it adds a
> packet of audio frame – i.e. about every 8 ms. Unfortunately, it seems that
> the latency information is completely unreliable at this level of
> interaction.
> 
> So, getting a good quality pulseaudio system will essentially require a
> complete rewrite of the backend to avoid using the 'simple' interface. It
> might take some time ;)

Hi again Mike,
I saw that came out of the Relise 2.3.x and that you are editing many aspects
of shairport sync. There is hope that you review latency and sync with
pulseaudio?
I also need to ask for clarification on file shairport-sync.conf. Where can I
send the request?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-bugs/attachments/20150603/dbe892f5/attachment.html>