[pulseaudio-discuss] "Expected" or "reasonable" latency
gmane at colin.guthr.ie
Mon Nov 9 10:04:36 PST 2009
'Twas brillig, and Eric Jonas at 09/11/09 17:23 did gyre and gimble:
> I'm developing an application which takes data off the network from a
> hardware device and plays it out the speaker. This is a continual stream
> of 32 ksps data from a dedicated ADC. I'm trying to keep the latency to
> the sound subsystem down below 80ms or so.
> Is this a reasonable latency to achieve under a 9.10 Ubuntu machine,
> using relatively uninteresting intel audio hardware?
> In experiments (following
> http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/LatencyControl ) I can get measured
> latencies down to around 40 ms at first, but then i get a few drop-outs
> and the latencies bump to 60, then 80, then... eventually getting up to
> 200+ ms. I'm curious if this is designed behavior (is pulse trying to
> adaptively change the latency / buffer size to prevent dropouts?) or if
> I'm doing something wrong here.
This does indeed sound like glitch-free working as expected.
Obviously in your case you know the hardware, but the user may very well
move the stream to e.g. a bluetooth device or similar where the latency
will be very different, do dealing with latency issues are something
that applications shouldn't really ignore. Aiming for low latency is
fine (if you don't care about power consumption), depending on it is
generally not :)
I can't remember the current state of the watermark lowering code. There
was a commit that lowered the water mark back down after a period of
glitch freeness, which does increase the potential for glitches again.
I'm not 100% sure if that commit is still in the code or not (I have a
very vague recollection of it being reverted, but I want to stress it's
a very vague recollection and could be very wrong!).
Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/]
Mandriva Linux Contributor [http://www.mandriva.com/]
PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/]
Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss