[Xcb] Splitting up xcb-util repository
halsmit at t-online.de
Thu Dec 2 00:38:48 PST 2010
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> > It might be beneficial for cloners if the repos themselves would
> > have the xcb prefix, like: xcb-utils-wm.
> Currently, we have xcb/util, so I'm thinking about following the same
> naming scheme for the repositories to be pushed, namely xcb/util-wm,
> xcb/util-keysyms and so on. When you clone, you can still do something
> like: git clone git://.../xcb/util xcb-util, but maybe I don't
> understand what you mean?
Yes, that's what I meant. But, being consistent is probably better
It's just that I sometimes stumble upon this when writing modulesets.
It would also be easier to find personal clones (are you working on
xorg/font/util?). However, it looks like there will be one big
moduleset soon, and the need to generate modulesets with scripts will
disappear. So, no real problem.
More information about the Xcb