[Xcb] Splitting up xcb-util repository
bart.massey at gmail.com
Sat Dec 4 13:06:40 PST 2010
Thanks huge for taking this on, Arnaud. Greatly appreciated. --Bart
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dirk Wallenstein <halsmit at t-online.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
>> > It might be beneficial for cloners if the repos themselves would
>> > have the xcb prefix, like: xcb-utils-wm.
>> Currently, we have xcb/util, so I'm thinking about following the same
>> naming scheme for the repositories to be pushed, namely xcb/util-wm,
>> xcb/util-keysyms and so on. When you clone, you can still do something
>> like: git clone git://.../xcb/util xcb-util, but maybe I don't
>> understand what you mean?
> Yes, that's what I meant. But, being consistent is probably better
> It's just that I sometimes stumble upon this when writing modulesets.
> It would also be easier to find personal clones (are you working on
> xorg/font/util?). However, it looks like there will be one big
> moduleset soon, and the need to generate modulesets with scripts will
> disappear. So, no real problem.
> Xcb mailing list
> Xcb at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the Xcb