[kde-artists] Icon Naming: animations/process-working, & animations/process-idle
James Richard Tyrer
tyrerj at acm.org
Thu Jul 5 19:27:20 PDT 2007
Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4. July 2007, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>> I note that the Icon Naming spec includes:
> Er, no, the naming spec does not include process-idle.
> Instead, it says in the description of process-working:
> "The first frame of the animation should be used for the resting state of the
> So, no need for process-idle, and especially not in animations.
You are correct that it isn't in the spec (yet?). It is in the Tango
icons. Part of the problem, I guess. Tango and the Icon Naming spec
aren't 100% the same.
IAC, Tango has this and GNOME has added this:
So, I think that we are going to need this.
> I'm not sure if it's necessary to do a specific KDE-branded icon, but in case
> it really is, it should be no problem to have one the way you described it.
> Apart from process-idle, which is not needed as mentioned above.
I'm not 100% certain about anything. However, branding seems to be
traditional in browsers -- yet Firefox/Thunderbird has dropped it. I
wouldn't like it if the KDE browsers didn't have a KDE branded throbber
when run with a KDE icon theme.
More information about the xdg