[Xesam] Practical applicability issues

[Jamie McCracken]

> >
> > It should be post xesam 1.0 obviously
> 
> How about lists of structs? Ie structs in your triple store.

sure so long as structs can only contain simple types (no lists or
nested structs)

> 
> To have any real benefit this actually needs to go in 1.0 as it would
> require incompatible changes to the ontology. As an alternative
> solution we could simply remove the affected fields from the 0.95
> ontology and then re-introduce them as structs in 1.X for X>0 (ie ship
> a reduced onto in 1.0). Either way would add incompatible changes to
> the onto though.
> 

which fields would be structs in the existing onto?


jamie