[Xesam] Nepomuk/Xesam future (was Re: condition of 1.0 ?)
bob4mail at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 09:00:25 PDT 2009
On Friday 24 April 2009 17:22:08 Jamie McCracken wrote:
> at this time so xesam does not look a viable standard at the moment
I can accept this, the most important point is to admit it.
Next question is: would ever be Xesam a viable standard?
Proposal from Ivan (please, correct me!!!) is to fork the Nepomuk ontology and
maintain it in a community-driven structure, defining then the common API to
access information. Is this possible? Is this a solution? Is this in the
interest? Would "relevant trackers" agree to apply what specified here?
What I'd like to see is to avoid a new failure as in Xesam 0.X: if a
standardization is possible let's work to define that, otherwise close this
project and move efforts in other directions.
Roberto -MadBob- Guido
More information about the Xesam