x.org is Hacker Trash

[Thomas Dickey]

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:20:51PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> It is relatively complex, and in some cases (e.g. the apps)
> unnecessarily so.  But the thing to realise is that most of the modules
> haven't changed in about a decade.  It's quite painful initially, but

hmm - I would use (or only accept) a qualifier like "most" if I actually
had a number.  Do you have one?   I haven't seen any evidence that any
of the Xorg hackers do metrics, and am curious why this is so.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20070330/91185791/attachment.pgp>