[PATCH] Standardizing the info message for unimplemented functions
Huang Rui
ray.huang at amd.com
Mon Aug 8 05:22:24 UTC 2016
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 05:17:41PM -0400, Alexandre Demers wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers at gmail.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c
> index 07e0475..9e327be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/dce_v6_0.c
> @@ -106,14 +106,14 @@ static const uint32_t hpd_int_control_offsets[6] = {
> static u32 dce_v6_0_audio_endpt_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> u32 block_offset, u32 reg)
> {
> - DRM_INFO("xxxx: dce_v6_0_audio_endpt_rreg ----no impl!!!!\n");
> + DRM_INFO("xxxx: dce_v6_0_audio_endpt_rreg --- not implemented!\n");
> return 0;
We can make the code more simple like below:
DRM_INFO("xxxx: %s --- not implemented!\n", __func__);
Thanks,
Rui
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list