[PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add bank selection for MMIO debugfs (v3)

[StDenis, Tom]

It's my understanding that kmalloc allocates entire pages (and ideally contiguous ones) so it's a bit more precious.  From my experience on the embedded space that was definitely the case.  Trying to allocate [say] multiple 64KB chunks could result in failures in short order.


Ultimately I'm not against either approach since the memory is so short lived and the function is not performance sensitive.  I'd just like to get these pushed today so I can get the debug updates pushed out too.


If you'd (or anyone) will slap a RB on it with kmalloc I'll gladly change it :-)


Tom


________________________________
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 11:30
To: StDenis, Tom; Tom St Denis; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add bank selection for MMIO debugfs (v3)

On 29.06.2016 16:22, StDenis, Tom wrote:
> Thanks.  I use vmalloc first to avoid putting the array on the stack (as
> good practice) then I chose vmalloc because there really isn't a need
> for contiguous memory and in theory it should be just as fast to
> allocate.  Wouldn't you typically use kmalloc when you need contiguous
> memory?  Though this all boils down to a single page since it's so small
> anyways.

If it's potentially non-contiguous memory, isn't there the overhead of
page table manipulation?

Maybe somebody who's more familiar with the kernel has an opinion...

Cheers,
Nicolai

>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 29, 2016 10:20
> *To:* Tom St Denis; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> *Cc:* StDenis, Tom
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/amdgpu: Add bank selection for MMIO
> debugfs (v3)
> Patch 1 & 3 are
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com>
>
> Patch 2 looks mostly fine to me, too, but I'm not sure about the
> vmalloc/vfree vs. kmalloc/kfree.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolai
>
> On 29.06.2016 15:56, Tom St Denis wrote:
>> (v2) Added INSTANCE selector
>> (v3) Changed order of bank selectors
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> index 7f08ac02f9de..4a8f66c5ff43 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> @@ -2244,20 +2244,43 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_regs_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
>>        struct amdgpu_device *adev = f->f_inode->i_private;
>>        ssize_t result = 0;
>>        int r;
>> +     bool use_bank;
>> +     unsigned instance_bank, sh_bank, se_bank;
>>
>>        if (size & 0x3 || *pos & 0x3)
>>                return -EINVAL;
>>
>> +     if (*pos & (1ULL << 62)) {
>> +             se_bank = (*pos >> 24) & 0x3FF;
>> +             sh_bank = (*pos >> 34) & 0x3FF;
>> +             instance_bank = (*pos >> 44) & 0x3FF;
>> +             use_bank = 1;
>> +             *pos &= 0xFFFFFF;
>> +     } else {
>> +             use_bank = 0;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     if (use_bank) {
>> +             if (sh_bank >= adev->gfx.config.max_sh_per_se ||
>> +                 se_bank >= adev->gfx.config.max_shader_engines)
>> +                     return -EINVAL;
>> +             mutex_lock(&adev->grbm_idx_mutex);
>> +             amdgpu_gfx_select_se_sh(adev, se_bank,
>> +                                     sh_bank, instance_bank);
>> +     }
>> +
>>        while (size) {
>>                uint32_t value;
>>
>>                if (*pos > adev->rmmio_size)
>> -                     return result;
>> +                     goto end;
>>
>>                value = RREG32(*pos >> 2);
>>                r = put_user(value, (uint32_t *)buf);
>> -             if (r)
>> -                     return r;
>> +             if (r) {
>> +                     result = r;
>> +                     goto end;
>> +             }
>>
>>                result += 4;
>>                buf += 4;
>> @@ -2265,6 +2288,12 @@ static ssize_t amdgpu_debugfs_regs_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
>>                size -= 4;
>>        }
>>
>> +end:
>> +     if (use_bank) {
>> +             amdgpu_gfx_select_se_sh(adev, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff);
>> +             mutex_unlock(&adev->grbm_idx_mutex);
>> +     }
>> +
>>        return result;
>>   }
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20160629/19e7ed10/attachment-0001.html>