[PATCH 12/20] drm/amdgpu:impl mm_r/weg_nokiq

[Deucher, Alexander]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Monk Liu
> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 1:11 AM
> To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Liu, Monk
> Subject: [PATCH 12/20] drm/amdgpu:impl mm_r/weg_nokiq
> 
> some registers are pf&vf copy, and we can safely use
> mmio method to access them.
> 
> and some time we are forbid to use kiq to access register
> like in INTR context.
> 
> Change-Id: Ie6dc323dc86829a4a6ceb7073c269b106b534c4a
> Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h        | 10 +++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 36
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> index 402a895..5dd0615 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,11 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device
> *adev,
>  void amdgpu_device_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>  int amdgpu_gpu_wait_for_idle(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> 
> +uint32_t amdgpu_mm_rreg_nokiq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t
> reg,
> +			bool always_indirect);
> +void amdgpu_mm_wreg_nokiq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg,
> uint32_t v,
> +		    bool always_indirect);
> +
>  uint32_t amdgpu_mm_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg,
>  			bool always_indirect);
>  void amdgpu_mm_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg,
> uint32_t v,
> @@ -1523,6 +1528,11 @@ bool amdgpu_device_has_dc_support(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev);
>  /*
>   * Registers read & write functions.
>   */
> +#define RREG32_nokiq(reg) amdgpu_mm_rreg_nokiq(adev, (reg), false)
> +#define RREG32_IDX_nokiq(reg) amdgpu_mm_rreg(adev, (reg), true)
> +#define WREG32_nokiq(reg, v) amdgpu_mm_wreg_nokiq(adev, (reg), (v),
> false)
> +#define WREG32_IDX_nokiq(reg, v) amdgpu_mm_wreg_nokiq(adev, (reg),
> (v), true)
> +

Can we call the macros something like RREG32_VF or RREG32_NO_KIQ?

>  #define RREG32(reg) amdgpu_mm_rreg(adev, (reg), false)
>  #define RREG32_IDX(reg) amdgpu_mm_rreg(adev, (reg), true)
>  #define DREG32(reg) printk(KERN_INFO "REGISTER: " #reg " : 0x%08X\n",
> amdgpu_mm_rreg(adev, (reg), false))
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 2b404ca..d5870d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,42 @@ void amdgpu_mm_wreg(struct amdgpu_device
> *adev, uint32_t reg, uint32_t v,
>  	}
>  }
> 
> +uint32_t amdgpu_mm_rreg_nokiq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t
> reg,
> +			bool always_indirect)
> +{
> +	uint32_t ret;
> +
> +	if ((reg * 4) < adev->rmmio_size && !always_indirect)
> +		ret = readl(((void __iomem *)adev->rmmio) + (reg * 4));
> +	else {
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&adev->mmio_idx_lock, flags);
> +		writel((reg * 4), ((void __iomem *)adev->rmmio) +
> (mmMM_INDEX * 4));
> +		ret = readl(((void __iomem *)adev->rmmio) +
> (mmMM_DATA * 4));
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->mmio_idx_lock, flags);
> +	}
> +	trace_amdgpu_mm_rreg(adev->pdev->device, reg, ret);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void amdgpu_mm_wreg_nokiq(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg,
> uint32_t v,
> +		    bool always_indirect)
> +{
> +	trace_amdgpu_mm_wreg(adev->pdev->device, reg, v);
> +
> +	if ((reg * 4) < adev->rmmio_size && !always_indirect)
> +		writel(v, ((void __iomem *)adev->rmmio) + (reg * 4));
> +	else {
> +		unsigned long flags;
> +
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&adev->mmio_idx_lock, flags);
> +		writel((reg * 4), ((void __iomem *)adev->rmmio) +
> (mmMM_INDEX * 4));
> +		writel(v, ((void __iomem *)adev->rmmio) + (mmMM_DATA
> * 4));
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->mmio_idx_lock, flags);
> +	}
> +}

These are duplicated with the regular mm_rreg and mm_wreg functions.  Maybe add a new parameter to the existing functions to bypass kiq in the sr-iov case?

> +
>  u32 amdgpu_io_rreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 reg)
>  {
>  	if ((reg * 4) < adev->rio_mem_size)
> --
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx