答复: [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu:implement META-DATA write routines
Liu, Monk
Monk.Liu at amd.com
Mon Jan 16 08:20:28 UTC 2017
if ring_write_multiple is organized in a separate patch, doesn't it introduces an function that no client using it ??
fine by me although ...
BR Monk
________________________________
发件人: Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
发送时间: 2017年1月12日 20:27:48
收件人: Liu, Monk; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
主题: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu:implement META-DATA write routines
Am 12.01.2017 um 08:41 schrieb Monk Liu:
> Change-Id: I66007a7f7e4e27fb129121f36143dce3cfb43738
> Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> index e9983fb..2039da7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> @@ -1599,6 +1599,37 @@ static inline void amdgpu_ring_write(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t v)
> ring->count_dw--;
> }
>
> +static inline void amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, void *src, int count_dw)
> +{
> + unsigned occupied, chunk1, chunk2;
> + void *dst;
> +
> + if (ring->count_dw < count_dw)
> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: writing more dwords to the ring than expected!\n");
> + else {
Coding style says when either the "if" or the "else" branch uses "{" and
"}" both should use them.
I think even better would be to use a return statement in the "if",
cause this is just checking the prerequisites for errors.
Additional to that adding this function should be a separate patch.
Christian.
> + occupied = ring->wptr & ring->ptr_mask;
> + dst = (void *)&ring->ring[occupied];
> + chunk1 = ring->ptr_mask + 1 - occupied;
> + chunk1 = (chunk1 >= count_dw) ? count_dw: chunk1;
> + chunk2 = count_dw - chunk1;
> + chunk1 <<= 2;
> + chunk2 <<= 2;
> + if (chunk1) {
> + memcpy(dst, src, chunk1);
> + }
> +
> + if (chunk2) {
> + src += chunk1;
> + dst = (void *)ring->ring;
> + memcpy(dst, src, chunk2);
> + }
> +
> + ring->wptr += count_dw;
> + ring->wptr &= ring->ptr_mask;
> + ring->count_dw -= count_dw;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static inline struct amdgpu_sdma_instance *
> amdgpu_get_sdma_instance(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> index 375784d..3e8cff3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> @@ -657,6 +657,8 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_set_gds_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> static void gfx_v8_0_set_rlc_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> static u32 gfx_v8_0_get_csb_size(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> static void gfx_v8_0_get_cu_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_ce_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t addr);
> +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_de_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t addr);
>
> static void gfx_v8_0_init_golden_registers(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> {
> @@ -7212,3 +7214,62 @@ const struct amdgpu_ip_block_version gfx_v8_1_ip_block =
> .rev = 0,
> .funcs = &gfx_v8_0_ip_funcs,
> };
> +
> +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_ce_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t csa_addr)
> +{
> + uint64_t ce_payload_addr;
> + int cnt_ce;
> + static union {
> + struct amdgpu_ce_ib_state regular;
> + struct amdgpu_ce_ib_state_chained_ib chained;
> + } ce_payload = {0};
> +
> + if (ring->adev->virt.chained_ib_support) {
> + ce_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct amdgpu_gfx_meta_data_chained_ib, ce_payload);
> + cnt_ce = (sizeof(ce_payload.chained) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> + } else {
> + ce_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct amdgpu_gfx_meta_data, ce_payload);
> + cnt_ce = (sizeof(ce_payload.regular) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> + }
> +
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, cnt_ce));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(2) |
> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(8) |
> + WR_CONFIRM) |
> + WRITE_DATA_CACHE_POLICY(0));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, lower_32_bits(ce_payload_addr));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, upper_32_bits(ce_payload_addr));
> + amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, (void *)&ce_payload, cnt_ce - 2);
> +}
> +
> +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_de_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t csa_addr)
> +{
> + uint64_t de_payload_addr, gds_addr;
> + int cnt_de;
> + static union {
> + struct amdgpu_de_ib_state regular;
> + struct amdgpu_de_ib_state_chained_ib chained;
> + } de_payload = {0};
> +
> + gds_addr = csa_addr + 4096;
> + if (ring->adev->virt.chained_ib_support) {
> + de_payload.chained.gds_backup_addrlo = lower_32_bits(gds_addr);
> + de_payload.chained.gds_backup_addrhi = upper_32_bits(gds_addr);
> + de_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct amdgpu_gfx_meta_data_chained_ib, de_payload);
> + cnt_de = (sizeof(de_payload.chained) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> + } else {
> + de_payload.regular.gds_backup_addrlo = lower_32_bits(gds_addr);
> + de_payload.regular.gds_backup_addrhi = upper_32_bits(gds_addr);
> + de_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct amdgpu_gfx_meta_data, de_payload);
> + cnt_de = (sizeof(de_payload.regular) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> + }
> +
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, cnt_de));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(1) |
> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(8) |
> + WR_CONFIRM) |
> + WRITE_DATA_CACHE_POLICY(0));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, lower_32_bits(de_payload_addr));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, upper_32_bits(de_payload_addr));
> + amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, (void *)&de_payload, cnt_de - 2);
> +}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170116/57955cde/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list