Re: 答复: [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu:implement META-DATA write routines

Christian König deathsimple at vodafone.de
Mon Jan 16 10:50:23 UTC 2017


That is perfectly fine as long as you add the code using it in the same 
set of patches.

What we should avoid is adding a lot of code and then not using for for 
quite some time, that get certainly removed sooner or later.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 16.01.2017 um 09:20 schrieb Liu, Monk:
>
> if ring_write_multiple is organized in a separate patch, doesn't it 
> introduces an function that no client using it ??
>
>
> fine by me although ...
>
>
> BR Monk
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *发件人:* Christian König <deathsimple at vodafone.de>
> *发送时间:* 2017年1月12日 20:27:48
> *收件人:* Liu, Monk; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> *主题:* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/amdgpu:implement META-DATA write routines
> Am 12.01.2017 um 08:41 schrieb Monk Liu:
> > Change-Id: I66007a7f7e4e27fb129121f36143dce3cfb43738
> > Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu at amd.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h   | 31 ++++++++++++++++++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 61 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> > index e9983fb..2039da7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
> > @@ -1599,6 +1599,37 @@ static inline void amdgpu_ring_write(struct 
> amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t v)
> >        ring->count_dw--;
> >   }
> >
> > +static inline void amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(struct amdgpu_ring 
> *ring, void *src, int count_dw)
> > +{
> > +     unsigned occupied, chunk1, chunk2;
> > +     void *dst;
> > +
> > +     if (ring->count_dw < count_dw)
> > +             DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: writing more dwords to the ring 
> than expected!\n");
> > +     else {
>
> Coding style says when either the "if" or the "else" branch uses "{" and
> "}" both should use them.
>
> I think even better would be to use a return statement in the "if",
> cause this is just checking the prerequisites for errors.
>
> Additional to that adding this function should be a separate patch.
>
> Christian.
>
> > +             occupied = ring->wptr & ring->ptr_mask;
> > +             dst = (void *)&ring->ring[occupied];
> > +             chunk1 = ring->ptr_mask + 1 - occupied;
> > +             chunk1 = (chunk1 >= count_dw) ? count_dw: chunk1;
> > +             chunk2 = count_dw - chunk1;
> > +             chunk1 <<= 2;
> > +             chunk2 <<= 2;
> > +             if (chunk1) {
> > +                     memcpy(dst, src, chunk1);
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (chunk2) {
> > +                     src += chunk1;
> > +                     dst = (void *)ring->ring;
> > +                     memcpy(dst, src, chunk2);
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             ring->wptr += count_dw;
> > +             ring->wptr &= ring->ptr_mask;
> > +             ring->count_dw -= count_dw;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >   static inline struct amdgpu_sdma_instance *
> >   amdgpu_get_sdma_instance(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
> >   {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > index 375784d..3e8cff3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c
> > @@ -657,6 +657,8 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_set_gds_init(struct 
> amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   static void gfx_v8_0_set_rlc_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   static u32 gfx_v8_0_get_csb_size(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   static void gfx_v8_0_get_cu_info(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> > +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_ce_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring 
> *ring, uint64_t addr);
> > +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_de_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring 
> *ring, uint64_t addr);
> >
> >   static void gfx_v8_0_init_golden_registers(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >   {
> > @@ -7212,3 +7214,62 @@ const struct amdgpu_ip_block_version 
> gfx_v8_1_ip_block =
> >        .rev = 0,
> >        .funcs = &gfx_v8_0_ip_funcs,
> >   };
> > +
> > +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_ce_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring 
> *ring, uint64_t csa_addr)
> > +{
> > +     uint64_t ce_payload_addr;
> > +     int cnt_ce;
> > +     static union {
> > +             struct amdgpu_ce_ib_state regular;
> > +             struct amdgpu_ce_ib_state_chained_ib chained;
> > +     } ce_payload = {0};
> > +
> > +     if (ring->adev->virt.chained_ib_support) {
> > +             ce_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct 
> amdgpu_gfx_meta_data_chained_ib, ce_payload);
> > +             cnt_ce = (sizeof(ce_payload.chained) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> > +     } else {
> > +             ce_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct 
> amdgpu_gfx_meta_data, ce_payload);
> > +             cnt_ce = (sizeof(ce_payload.regular) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, cnt_ce));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(2) |
> > +                             WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(8) |
> > +                             WR_CONFIRM) |
> > + WRITE_DATA_CACHE_POLICY(0));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, lower_32_bits(ce_payload_addr));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, upper_32_bits(ce_payload_addr));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, (void *)&ce_payload, cnt_ce - 2);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void gfx_v8_0_ring_emit_de_meta_init(struct amdgpu_ring 
> *ring, uint64_t csa_addr)
> > +{
> > +     uint64_t de_payload_addr, gds_addr;
> > +     int cnt_de;
> > +     static union {
> > +             struct amdgpu_de_ib_state regular;
> > +             struct amdgpu_de_ib_state_chained_ib chained;
> > +     } de_payload = {0};
> > +
> > +     gds_addr = csa_addr + 4096;
> > +     if (ring->adev->virt.chained_ib_support) {
> > +             de_payload.chained.gds_backup_addrlo = 
> lower_32_bits(gds_addr);
> > +             de_payload.chained.gds_backup_addrhi = 
> upper_32_bits(gds_addr);
> > +             de_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct 
> amdgpu_gfx_meta_data_chained_ib, de_payload);
> > +             cnt_de = (sizeof(de_payload.chained) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> > +     } else {
> > +             de_payload.regular.gds_backup_addrlo = 
> lower_32_bits(gds_addr);
> > +             de_payload.regular.gds_backup_addrhi = 
> upper_32_bits(gds_addr);
> > +             de_payload_addr = csa_addr + offsetof(struct 
> amdgpu_gfx_meta_data, de_payload);
> > +             cnt_de = (sizeof(de_payload.regular) >> 2) + 4 - 2;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, cnt_de));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(1) |
> > +                             WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(8) |
> > +                             WR_CONFIRM) |
> > + WRITE_DATA_CACHE_POLICY(0));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, lower_32_bits(de_payload_addr));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write(ring, upper_32_bits(de_payload_addr));
> > +     amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, (void *)&de_payload, cnt_de - 2);
> > +}
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170116/9e122aef/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list