Question about porting VCE1 to amdgpu

[Christian König]

> OK. Then,  is it expected to have a validation failure with the 
> current firmware?
Yeah, that won't work. We never released the firmware with the header 
for SI parts.

See for CIK we have upper and lower case firmware files, the lower case 
are the new ones with the header.

> I've been using VCE2 port as my template for VCE1. My initial 
> intention was to work on UVD, but I ended up plugging in VCE in the 
> first place. UVD is on my todo list right next, I was expecting to 
> working on it after fixing the VCE part.
That stuff would be really nice to get fixed. But i fear you won't get 
far without AMD internal help. I will see what I can do about that.

Thanks for the effort,
Christian.

Am 14.06.2017 um 19:30 schrieb Alexandre Demers:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 at 13:09 Deucher, Alexander 
> <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com <mailto:Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>> wrote:
>
>     *From:*amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org
>     <mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org>] *On Behalf Of
>     *Christian König
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2017 12:37 PM
>     *To:* Alexandre Demers; Freedesktop - AMD-gfx
>     *Subject:* Re: Question about porting VCE1 to amdgpu
>
>         - Would we need a different firmware version with a different
>         "hdr" for the amdgpu driver?
>
>     Yes, we should probably release the latest one instead of reusing
>     the one used with radeon.
>
>     Actually, we should probably stick the same one as radeon for now
>     until we can verify the new firmware in general.  Easier to start
>     with a known working case.
>
> OK. Then,  is it expected to have a validation failure with the 
> current firmware? Is the header compatible with how the validation is 
> done under VCE2 and others or should I keep how it was done under radeon?
>
>
>     BTW: Does VCE work on CIK? Alex, don't we run into the same issue
>     there as well?
>
>     VCE works on CIK.  We ported VCE and UVD to CIK as part of the
>     initial amdgpu bring up.
>
> I've been using VCE2 port as my template for VCE1. My initial 
> intention was to work on UVD, but I ended up plugging in VCE in the 
> first place. UVD is on my todo list right next, I was expecting to 
> working on it after fixing the VCE part.
>
>     Alex
>
>
>
>     - Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while
>     having VCE disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the FW?
>     Completely failing to load the driver for this reason seems
>     overkill IMO, since nothing has been loaded in memory and no
>     registry have been modified up to that point.
>
>     UVD and VCE are actually needed for correct power management. When
>     the blocks fail to initialize you usually sooner or later run into
>     problems with power management (e.g. stuck inside a certain power
>     level).
>
> OK, but right now it is disabled, so the situation wouldn't be worst 
> isn't it?
>
>
>     - Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of you
>     could help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the last
>     modifications need to be done?
>
>     Well you could, but to be honest without AMD releasing new
>     firmware that is most likely a futile effort.
>
>
> I'll send a patch then, and we'll navigate from there. This will allow 
> me to work on UVD in parallel.
>
> Alexandre Demers
>
>
>     Regards,
>     Christian.
>
>     Am 14.06.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Alexandre Demers:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I've been working on porting VCE1 from radeon to amdgpu in the
>         last few weeks. I'm pretty much done and I've enabled the
>         functionality to see how it goes. However, I ended up with an
>         error on the firmware validation (size doesn't seem to fit),
>         thus failing completely in loading the driver. I'm testing on
>         a R9 280X (Tahiti).
>
>         Three questions then:
>
>         - Would we need a different firmware version with a different
>         "hdr" for the amdgpu driver?
>
>         - Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while
>         having VCE disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the
>         FW? Completely failing to load the driver for this reason
>         seems overkill IMO, since nothing has been loaded in memory
>         and no registry have been modified up to that point.
>
>         - Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of
>         you could help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the
>         last modifications need to be done?
>
>         Thank you!
>
>         Alexandre Demers
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         amd-gfx mailing list
>
>         amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>         <mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
>
>         https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20170614/00534eae/attachment-0001.html>