[PATCH 0/8] The vega10 sriov still need those patches

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Apr 3 15:07:23 UTC 2018


On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
> On 2018-04-03 11:07 AM, Emily Deng wrote:
>> For vega10 sriov, still need to use one package for invalidate tlb
>> flush
>>
>> Emily Deng (8):
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
>>     callback""
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/sdma4: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
>>     callback""
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/uvd7: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
>>     callback""
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/vce4: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
>>     callback""
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/vcn1: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
>>     callback""
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/gmc9: use
>>     amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait in gpu tlb flush""
>>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/sdma4:fix sdma engine hang""
>>   drm/amdgpu/gfx9: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring callback
>
> 'Revert "Revert "...""' is pretty ugly, better to use the original
> commit logs again (possibly with amendments explaining why they're being
> applied gain).

I agree.  If the fix from Ray fixes the hangs on gfx, please just
generate new patches by cherry-picking the originals and squashing in
any fixes and updating the commit messages if necessary.  E.g., you
can squash your sdma4 fix into the original sdma4 patch.

Thanks,

Alex


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list