[PATCH 0/8] The vega10 sriov still need those patches

[Deng, Emily]

Thanks all,  I will change the patches as you sugestion, and send to you review again.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Deucher [mailto:alexdeucher at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 11:07 PM
> To: Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net>
> Cc: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>; amd-gfx list <amd-
> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] The vega10 sriov still need those patches
> 
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote:
> > On 2018-04-03 11:07 AM, Emily Deng wrote:
> >> For vega10 sriov, still need to use one package for invalidate tlb
> >> flush
> >>
> >> Emily Deng (8):
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
> >>     callback""
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/sdma4: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
> >>     callback""
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/uvd7: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
> >>     callback""
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/vce4: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
> >>     callback""
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/vcn1: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring
> >>     callback""
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/gmc9: use
> >>     amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait in gpu tlb flush""
> >>   Revert "Revert "drm/amdgpu/sdma4:fix sdma engine hang""
> >>   drm/amdgpu/gfx9: add emit_reg_write_reg_wait ring callback
> >
> > 'Revert "Revert "...""' is pretty ugly, better to use the original
> > commit logs again (possibly with amendments explaining why they're
> > being applied gain).
> 
> I agree.  If the fix from Ray fixes the hangs on gfx, please just generate new
> patches by cherry-picking the originals and squashing in any fixes and
> updating the commit messages if necessary.  E.g., you can squash your
> sdma4 fix into the original sdma4 patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex