[PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Remove the sriov checking and add firmware checking

Christian König ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 13:17:20 UTC 2018


Am 16.08.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Emily Deng:
> Unify bare metal and sriov, and add firmware checking for
> reg write and reg wait unify command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h |  2 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c   | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> index 53e9e2a..f172e92 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
> @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ struct amdgpu_gfx {
>   	uint32_t			rlc_srls_feature_version;
>   	uint32_t			mec_feature_version;
>   	uint32_t			mec2_feature_version;
> +	bool				mec_fw_write_wait;
> +	bool				me_fw_write_wait;
>   	struct amdgpu_ring		gfx_ring[AMDGPU_MAX_GFX_RINGS];
>   	unsigned			num_gfx_rings;
>   	struct amdgpu_ring		compute_ring[AMDGPU_MAX_COMPUTE_RINGS];
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> index 76d979e..76e8973 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,47 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_init_rlc_ext_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   			le32_to_cpu(rlc_hdr->reg_list_format_direct_reg_list_length);
>   }
>   
> +static void gfx_v9_0_check_fw_write_wait(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> +{
> +	adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = false;
> +	adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = false;
> +
> +	switch (adev->asic_type) {
> +	case CHIP_VEGA10:
> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev->gfx.me_feature_version >= 42) &&
> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b1) && (adev->gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 42))
> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;

Well that looks like the correct solution to me. Only a nit pick left to 
fix, the coding style looks a bit off.

For example the "if" should be indented so that "(adev.." in both lines 
is on the same column:

if ((adev.... ) &&
     (adev....

And the "adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;" is to far to the right.

With that fixed the patch is Acked-by: Christian König 
<christian.koenig at amd.com>.

Regards,
Christian.

> +
> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000193) && (adev->gfx.mec_feature_version >= 42))
> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
> +		break;
> +	case CHIP_VEGA12:
> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev->gfx.me_feature_version >= 44) &&
> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b2) && (adev->gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 44))
> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
> +
> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000196) && (adev->gfx.mec_feature_version >= 44))
> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
> +		break;
> +	case CHIP_VEGA20:
> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev->gfx.me_feature_version >= 44) &&
> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b2) && (adev->gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 44))
> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
> +
> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000197) && (adev->gfx.mec_feature_version >= 44))
> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
> +		break;
> +	case CHIP_RAVEN:
> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev->gfx.me_feature_version >= 42) &&
> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b1) && (adev->gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 42))
> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
> +
> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000192) && (adev->gfx.mec_feature_version >= 42))
> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static int gfx_v9_0_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	const char *chip_name;
> @@ -716,6 +757,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   	}
>   
>   out:
> +	gfx_v9_0_check_fw_write_wait(adev);
>   	if (err) {
>   		dev_err(adev->dev,
>   			"gfx9: Failed to load firmware \"%s\"\n",
> @@ -4348,8 +4390,11 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>   						  uint32_t ref, uint32_t mask)
>   {
>   	int usepfp = (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX);
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
> +	bool fw_version_ok = (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) ?
> +		adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait : adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait;
>   
> -	if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(ring->adev))
> +	if (fw_version_ok)
>   		gfx_v9_0_wait_reg_mem(ring, usepfp, 0, 1, reg0, reg1,
>   				      ref, mask, 0x20);
>   	else



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list