[PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Remove the sriov checking and add firmware checking

Deng, Emily Emily.Deng at amd.com
Fri Aug 17 02:17:50 UTC 2018


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
>Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 9:17 PM
>To: Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Remove the sriov checking and add
>firmware checking
>
>Am 16.08.2018 um 15:05 schrieb Emily Deng:
>> Unify bare metal and sriov, and add firmware checking for reg write
>> and reg wait unify command.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h |  2 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c   | 47
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
>> index 53e9e2a..f172e92 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.h
>> @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ struct amdgpu_gfx {
>>   	uint32_t			rlc_srls_feature_version;
>>   	uint32_t			mec_feature_version;
>>   	uint32_t			mec2_feature_version;
>> +	bool				mec_fw_write_wait;
>> +	bool				me_fw_write_wait;
>>   	struct amdgpu_ring		gfx_ring[AMDGPU_MAX_GFX_RINGS];
>>   	unsigned			num_gfx_rings;
>>   	struct amdgpu_ring
>	compute_ring[AMDGPU_MAX_COMPUTE_RINGS];
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> index 76d979e..76e8973 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
>> @@ -482,6 +482,47 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_init_rlc_ext_microcode(struct
>amdgpu_device *adev)
>>   			le32_to_cpu(rlc_hdr-
>>reg_list_format_direct_reg_list_length);
>>   }
>>
>> +static void gfx_v9_0_check_fw_write_wait(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>> +{
>> +	adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = false;
>> +	adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = false;
>> +
>> +	switch (adev->asic_type) {
>> +	case CHIP_VEGA10:
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev-
>>gfx.me_feature_version >= 42) &&
>> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b1) && (adev-
>>gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 42))
>> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
>
>Well that looks like the correct solution to me. Only a nit pick left to fix, the
>coding style looks a bit off.
>
>For example the "if" should be indented so that "(adev.." in both lines is on the
>same column:
>
>if ((adev.... ) &&
>     (adev....
>
>And the "adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;" is to far to the right.
>
Thanks, will modify as your suggestion.
>With that fixed the patch is Acked-by: Christian König
><christian.koenig at amd.com>.
>
>Regards,
>Christian.
>
>> +
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000193) && (adev-
>>gfx.mec_feature_version >= 42))
>> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +		break;
>> +	case CHIP_VEGA12:
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev-
>>gfx.me_feature_version >= 44) &&
>> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b2) && (adev-
>>gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 44))
>> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000196) && (adev-
>>gfx.mec_feature_version >= 44))
>> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +		break;
>> +	case CHIP_VEGA20:
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev-
>>gfx.me_feature_version >= 44) &&
>> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b2) && (adev-
>>gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 44))
>> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000197) && (adev-
>>gfx.mec_feature_version >= 44))
>> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +		break;
>> +	case CHIP_RAVEN:
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.me_fw_version >= 0x0000009c) && (adev-
>>gfx.me_feature_version >= 42) &&
>> +			(adev->gfx.pfp_fw_version >=  0x000000b1) && (adev-
>>gfx.pfp_feature_version >= 42))
>> +				adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +
>> +		if ((adev->gfx.mec_fw_version >=  0x00000192) && (adev-
>>gfx.mec_feature_version >= 42))
>> +				adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait = true;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int gfx_v9_0_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>   {
>>   	const char *chip_name;
>> @@ -716,6 +757,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_init_microcode(struct
>amdgpu_device *adev)
>>   	}
>>
>>   out:
>> +	gfx_v9_0_check_fw_write_wait(adev);
>>   	if (err) {
>>   		dev_err(adev->dev,
>>   			"gfx9: Failed to load firmware \"%s\"\n", @@ -4348,8
>+4390,11 @@
>> static void gfx_v9_0_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>>   						  uint32_t ref, uint32_t mask)
>>   {
>>   	int usepfp = (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX);
>> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>> +	bool fw_version_ok = (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) ?
>> +		adev->gfx.me_fw_write_wait : adev->gfx.mec_fw_write_wait;
>>
>> -	if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(ring->adev))
>> +	if (fw_version_ok)
>>   		gfx_v9_0_wait_reg_mem(ring, usepfp, 0, 1, reg0, reg1,
>>   				      ref, mask, 0x20);
>>   	else



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list