[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: disable page queue on Vega10 SR-IOV VF

[Koenig, Christian]

Hi guys,

this is necessary for recoverable page fault handling.

When the normal SDMA queue is blocked because of a page fault the SDMA 
firmware will switch to the paging queue so that we are able to handle 
the fault.

In general it should work on all Vega (but not Raven) components and we 
are going to need it when we enable recoverable page faults.

The only case I can see where we don't immediately need it is SRIOV, 
because the current planning is to not support recoverable page faults 
there.

Christian.

Am 07.11.18 um 08:21 schrieb Liu, Monk:
> Hi team
>
> Why we need this page_queue in amdgpu ?  can anyone share something of its introduction to the kmd ?
> According to my understanding , gpu-scheduler already have couple levels of priority for contexts/entities , thus the job page_queue supposed to do (should be mapping/unmapping/moving) is already good took care of by "KERNEL" priority entities, and all other context/entity SDMA jobs will be handled after "KERNEL" jobs ...
>
> So there is no real benefit to introduce page_queue (also for rlc_queue) to amdgpu with the existence of priority aware gpu-scheduler ... unless we are going to remove the "KERNEL" priority and always do the mapping/unmapping in page_queue ...
>
> /Monk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Zhang, Jerry(Junwei)
> Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 1:26 PM
> To: Huang, Trigger <Trigger.Huang at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: disable page queue on Vega10 SR-IOV VF
>
> On 11/7/18 1:15 PM, Trigger Huang wrote:
>> Currently, SDMA page queue is not used under SR-IOV VF, and this queue
>> will cause ring test failure in amdgpu module reload case. So just disable it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Trigger Huang <Trigger.Huang at amd.com>
> Looks we ran into several issues about it on vega.
> kfd also disabled vega10 for development.(but not sure the detail issue for them)
>
> Thus, we may disable it for vega10 as well?
> any comment? Alex, Christian, Flex.
>
> Regards,
> Jerry
>> ---
>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c | 4 +++-
>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
>> index e39a09eb0f..4edc848 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c
>> @@ -1451,7 +1451,9 @@ static int sdma_v4_0_early_init(void *handle)
>>    		adev->sdma.has_page_queue = false;
>>    	} else {
>>    		adev->sdma.num_instances = 2;
>> -		if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA20 &&
>> +		if ((adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10) && amdgpu_sriov_vf((adev)))
>> +			adev->sdma.has_page_queue = false;
>> +		else if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA20 &&
>>    				adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA12)
>>    			adev->sdma.has_page_queue = true;
>>    	}
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx