[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix amdgpu_vm_alloc_pts failed
Zhu, Rex
Rex.Zhu at amd.com
Tue Oct 23 03:31:13 UTC 2018
Thanks Jerry.
Good suggestion.
Use the right mask for PD instand of hardcode.
so don't need to revert the whole patch.
Best Regards
Rex
________________________________
From: Zhang, Jerry
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:02 AM
To: Zhu, Rex; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig, Christian
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix amdgpu_vm_alloc_pts failed
On 10/23/2018 12:09 AM, Rex Zhu wrote:
> When the va address located in the last pd entry,
Do you mean the root PD?
maybe we need roundup root PD in amdgpu_vm_entries_mask() like
amdgpu_vm_num_entries().
BTW, looks amdgpu_vm_entries_mask() is going to replace the
amdgpu_vm_num_entries()
Jerry
> the alloc_pts will failed.
> caused by
> "drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_vm_entries_mask v2"
> commit 72af632549b97ead9251bb155f08fefd1fb6f5c3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 34 +++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 054633b..1a3af72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -191,26 +191,6 @@ static unsigned amdgpu_vm_num_entries(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> }
>
> /**
> - * amdgpu_vm_entries_mask - the mask to get the entry number of a PD/PT
> - *
> - * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> - * @level: VMPT level
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - * The mask to extract the entry number of a PD/PT from an address.
> - */
> -static uint32_t amdgpu_vm_entries_mask(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> - unsigned int level)
> -{
> - if (level <= adev->vm_manager.root_level)
> - return 0xffffffff;
> - else if (level != AMDGPU_VM_PTB)
> - return 0x1ff;
> - else
> - return AMDGPU_VM_PTE_COUNT(adev) - 1;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * amdgpu_vm_bo_size - returns the size of the BOs in bytes
> *
> * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer
> @@ -419,17 +399,17 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_start(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> static bool amdgpu_vm_pt_descendant(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *cursor)
> {
> - unsigned mask, shift, idx;
> + unsigned num_entries, shift, idx;
>
> if (!cursor->entry->entries)
> return false;
>
> BUG_ON(!cursor->entry->base.bo);
> - mask = amdgpu_vm_entries_mask(adev, cursor->level);
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level);
> shift = amdgpu_vm_level_shift(adev, cursor->level);
>
> ++cursor->level;
> - idx = (cursor->pfn >> shift) & mask;
> + idx = (cursor->pfn >> shift) % num_entries;
> cursor->parent = cursor->entry;
> cursor->entry = &cursor->entry->entries[idx];
> return true;
> @@ -1618,7 +1598,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_pte_update_params *params,
> amdgpu_vm_pt_start(adev, params->vm, start, &cursor);
> while (cursor.pfn < end) {
> struct amdgpu_bo *pt = cursor.entry->base.bo;
> - unsigned shift, parent_shift, mask;
> + unsigned shift, parent_shift, num_entries;
> uint64_t incr, entry_end, pe_start;
>
> if (!pt)
> @@ -1673,9 +1653,9 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_pte_update_params *params,
>
> /* Looks good so far, calculate parameters for the update */
> incr = AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE << shift;
> - mask = amdgpu_vm_entries_mask(adev, cursor.level);
> - pe_start = ((cursor.pfn >> shift) & mask) * 8;
> - entry_end = (mask + 1) << shift;
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor.level);
> + pe_start = ((cursor.pfn >> shift) & (num_entries - 1)) * 8;
> + entry_end = num_entries << shift;
> entry_end += cursor.pfn & ~(entry_end - 1);
> entry_end = min(entry_end, end);
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20181023/20a3c3bf/attachment.html>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list