[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid using invalidate semaphore for picasso(v2)
Zhu, Changfeng
Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com
Tue Dec 10 11:03:44 UTC 2019
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
OK, Chris.
What's about SRIOV?
Should we skip using semaphore registers for SRIOV now?
I add REG32_SOC15_OFFSET(MMHUB, 0, mmVM_INVALIDATE_ENG0_SEM, i, 0x0);
in mmhub_v1_0_program_invalidation.
However, the problem still happens.
BR,
Changfeng,
-----Original Message-----
From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 6:55 PM
To: Zhu, Changfeng <Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang at amd.com>; Huang, Shimmer <Xinmei.Huang at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid using invalidate semaphore for picasso(v2)
Am 10.12.19 um 03:55 schrieb Changfeng.Zhu:
> From: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com>
>
> It may cause timeout waiting for sem acquire in VM flush when using
> invalidate semaphore for picasso. So it needs to avoid using
> invalidate semaphore for piasso.
It would probably be better to add a small helper function to decide if the semaphore registers should be used or not.
E.g. something like "bool gmc_v9_0_use_semaphore(adev, vmhub...)"
Apart from that looks good to me,
Christian.
>
> Change-Id: I6dc552bde180919cd5ba6c81c6d9e3f800043b03
> Signed-off-by: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> index 231ea9762cb5..601667246a1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> @@ -464,8 +464,11 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
> */
>
> /* TODO: It needs to continue working on debugging with semaphore for GFXHUB as well. */
> - if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> - vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) {
> + if ((vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> + vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) &&
> + (!(adev->asic_type == CHIP_RAVEN &&
> + adev->rev_id < 0x8 &&
> + adev->pdev->device == 0x15d8))) {
> for (j = 0; j < adev->usec_timeout; j++) {
> /* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> tmp = RREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng); @@ -495,8
> +498,11 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
> }
>
> /* TODO: It needs to continue working on debugging with semaphore for GFXHUB as well. */
> - if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> - vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> + if ((vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> + vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) &&
> + (!(adev->asic_type == CHIP_RAVEN &&
> + adev->rev_id < 0x8 &&
> + adev->pdev->device == 0x15d8)))
> /*
> * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> * write with 0 means semaphore release @@ -527,8 +533,11 @@
> static uint64_t gmc_v9_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> */
>
> /* TODO: It needs to continue working on debugging with semaphore for GFXHUB as well. */
> - if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> - ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> + if ((ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> + ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) &&
> + (!(adev->asic_type == CHIP_RAVEN &&
> + adev->rev_id < 0x8 &&
> + adev->pdev->device == 0x15d8)))
> /* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_wait(ring,
> hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0x1, 0x1); @@ -544,8 +553,11 @@
> static uint64_t gmc_v9_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> req, 1 << vmid);
>
> /* TODO: It needs to continue working on debugging with semaphore for GFXHUB as well. */
> - if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> - ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> + if ((ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> + ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) &&
> + (!(adev->asic_type == CHIP_RAVEN &&
> + adev->rev_id < 0x8 &&
> + adev->pdev->device == 0x15d8)))
> /*
> * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> * write with 0 means semaphore release
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list