[PATCH 3/3] drm/amdkfd: Remove the control stack workaround for GFX10
Zhao, Yong
Yong.Zhao at amd.com
Thu Sep 26 18:41:52 UTC 2019
Hi Felix,
I reworded this patch in the next series. Please review the first two patches in this series.
Regards,
Yong
________________________________
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Zhao, Yong <Yong.Zhao at amd.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 2:34 PM
To: Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdkfd: Remove the control stack workaround for GFX10
Yes. I confirmed with CP guys and they said the behavior on GFX10 is the
same as GFX8 now. I remember that the workaround on GFX9 was to help
with a HW bug, but not too sure.
Regards,
Yong
On 2019-09-25 2:25 p.m., Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> On 2019-09-25 2:15 p.m., Zhao, Yong wrote:
>> The GFX10 does not have this hardware bug any more, so remove it.
> I wouldn't call this a bug and a workaround. More like a change in the
> HW or FW behaviour and a corresponding driver change. I.e. in GFXv8 the
> control stack was in the user mode CWSR allocation. In GFXv9 it moved
> into a kernel mode buffer next to the MQD. So in GFXv10 the control
> stack moved back into the user mode CWSR buffer?
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>> Change-Id: I446c9685549a09ac8846a42ee22d86cfb93fd98c
>> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao <Yong.Zhao at amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v10.c | 37 ++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v10.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v10.c
>> index 9cd3eb2d90bd..4a236b2c2354 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v10.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v10.c
>> @@ -69,35 +69,13 @@ static void update_cu_mask(struct mqd_manager *mm, void *mqd,
>> static struct kfd_mem_obj *allocate_mqd(struct kfd_dev *kfd,
>> struct queue_properties *q)
>> {
>> - int retval;
>> - struct kfd_mem_obj *mqd_mem_obj = NULL;
>> + struct kfd_mem_obj *mqd_mem_obj;
>>
>> - /* From V9, for CWSR, the control stack is located on the next page
>> - * boundary after the mqd, we will use the gtt allocation function
>> - * instead of sub-allocation function.
>> - */
>> - if (kfd->cwsr_enabled && (q->type == KFD_QUEUE_TYPE_COMPUTE)) {
>> - mqd_mem_obj = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kfd_mem_obj), GFP_NOIO);
>> - if (!mqd_mem_obj)
>> - return NULL;
>> - retval = amdgpu_amdkfd_alloc_gtt_mem(kfd->kgd,
>> - ALIGN(q->ctl_stack_size, PAGE_SIZE) +
>> - ALIGN(sizeof(struct v10_compute_mqd), PAGE_SIZE),
>> - &(mqd_mem_obj->gtt_mem),
>> - &(mqd_mem_obj->gpu_addr),
>> - (void *)&(mqd_mem_obj->cpu_ptr), true);
>> - } else {
>> - retval = kfd_gtt_sa_allocate(kfd, sizeof(struct v10_compute_mqd),
>> - &mqd_mem_obj);
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (retval) {
>> - kfree(mqd_mem_obj);
>> + if (kfd_gtt_sa_allocate(kfd, sizeof(struct v10_compute_mqd),
>> + &mqd_mem_obj))
>> return NULL;
>> - }
>>
>> return mqd_mem_obj;
>> -
>> }
>>
>> static void init_mqd(struct mqd_manager *mm, void **mqd,
>> @@ -250,14 +228,7 @@ static int destroy_mqd(struct mqd_manager *mm, void *mqd,
>> static void free_mqd(struct mqd_manager *mm, void *mqd,
>> struct kfd_mem_obj *mqd_mem_obj)
>> {
>> - struct kfd_dev *kfd = mm->dev;
>> -
>> - if (mqd_mem_obj->gtt_mem) {
>> - amdgpu_amdkfd_free_gtt_mem(kfd->kgd, mqd_mem_obj->gtt_mem);
>> - kfree(mqd_mem_obj);
>> - } else {
>> - kfd_gtt_sa_free(mm->dev, mqd_mem_obj);
>> - }
>> + kfd_gtt_sa_free(mm->dev, mqd_mem_obj);
>> }
>>
>> static bool is_occupied(struct mqd_manager *mm, void *mqd,
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20190926/a28c0d70/attachment.html>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list