[PATCH 2/5] drm/amdgpu: return EINVAL instead of ENOENT in the VM code

[Christian König]

That we can't find a PD above the root is expected can only happen if
we try to update a larger range than actually managed by the VM.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Tested-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 4ba6a5e5d094..9705c961405b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
 			 * shift we should go up one level and check it again.
 			 */
 			if (!amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(&cursor))
-				return -ENOENT;
+				return -EINVAL;
 			continue;
 		}
 
-- 
2.17.1