[PATCH 2/5] drm/amdgpu: return EINVAL instead of ENOENT in the VM code

[Felix Kuehling]

On 2020-01-30 7:49, Christian König wrote:
> That we can't find a PD above the root is expected can only happen if
> we try to update a larger range than actually managed by the VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Tested-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 4ba6a5e5d094..9705c961405b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>   			 * shift we should go up one level and check it again.
>   			 */
>   			if (!amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(&cursor))
> -				return -ENOENT;
> +				return -EINVAL;
>   			continue;
>   		}
>