[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix identical code for different branches
Len Baker
len.baker at gmx.com
Fri Jul 16 17:10:33 UTC 2021
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 10:45:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-07-11 at 19:24 +0200, Len Baker wrote:
> > The branches of the "if" statement are the same. So remove the
> > unnecessary if and goto statements.
> >
> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456916 ("Identical code for different branches")
> > Fixes: 4c283fdac08ab ("drm/amd/display: Add HDCP module")
> > Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker at gmx.com>
>
> I'm not a big fan of this type of change.
>
> It's currently the same style used for six tests in this function
> and changing this last one would just make it harder to see the
> code blocks as consistent.
>
> I doubt any reasonable compiler would produce different objects.
Ok, thanks for the review. I leave it as is.
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c
> []
> > @@ -305,10 +305,8 @@ static enum mod_hdcp_status wait_for_ready(struct mod_hdcp *hdcp,
> > hdcp, "bcaps_read"))
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - if (!mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready,
> > - &input->ready_check, &status,
> > - hdcp, "ready_check"))
> > - goto out;
> > + mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready, &input->ready_check, &status,
> > + hdcp, "ready_check");
> > out:
> > return status;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Thanks,
Len
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list