[PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix logic bug in fatal error handling
SHANMUGAM, SRINIVASAN
SRINIVASAN.SHANMUGAM at amd.com
Thu Mar 23 12:36:41 UTC 2023
[Public]
Hi Mario,
Thanks for your comments, it was on " origin/amd-staging-drm-next"
Best Regards,
Srini
-----Original Message-----
From: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello at amd.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 6:03 PM
To: SHANMUGAM, SRINIVASAN <SRINIVASAN.SHANMUGAM at amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>; Li, Candice <Candice.Li at amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix logic bug in fatal error handling
[Public]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SHANMUGAM, SRINIVASAN
> <SRINIVASAN.SHANMUGAM at amd.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2023 07:32
> To: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario.Limonciello at amd.com>; Li, Candice <Candice.Li at amd.com>; Zhang,
> Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>
> Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; SHANMUGAM, SRINIVASAN
> <SRINIVASAN.SHANMUGAM at amd.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix logic bug in fatal error handling
>
> CC drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c:2567:28: error: bitwise or
> with non-zero value always evaluates to true
> [-Werror,-Wtautological-bitwise- compare]
> if (adev->ras_hw_enabled | AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__DF)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Presumably the author intended to test if AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__DF bit was
> set if ras is enabled, so that's what I'm changing the code to.
> Hopefully to do the right thing.
>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello at amd.com>
> Cc: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>
> Cc: Candice Li <candice.li at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> index 5b17790218811..fac45f98145d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c
> @@ -2564,7 +2564,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> adev->nbio.ras = &nbio_v7_4_ras;
> break;
> case IP_VERSION(4, 3, 0):
> - if (adev->ras_hw_enabled | AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__DF)
> + if (adev->ras_hw_enabled & AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__DF)
> /* unlike other generation of nbio ras,
> * nbio v4_3 only support fatal error interrupt
> * to inform software that DF is freezed due to
> --
> 2.25.1
This change generally makes sense for what you showed above, but what tree is this against? That doesn't look like amd-staging-drm-next, Linus' tree or even some recent tags.
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list