[PATCH 10/16] drm/amdgpu: validate doorbell read/write

Luben Tuikov luben.tuikov at amd.com
Thu Mar 30 14:34:57 UTC 2023


On 2023-03-29 11:47, Shashank Sharma wrote:
> This patch:
> - updates start/end values for each of the doorbell object
>   created.
> - adds a function which validates that the kernel doorbell read/write
>   is within this range.
> - uses this function during doorbell writes from kernel.
> 
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav at amd.com>
> ---
>  .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c  | 29 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c
> index b46fe8b1378d..81713b2c28e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,25 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include "amdgpu.h"
> +#include "kfd_priv.h"
> +
> +static inline
> +bool amdgpu_doorbell_valid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index)
> +{
> +	if (index >= adev->doorbell.kernel_doorbells.start &&
> +	    index < adev->doorbell.kernel_doorbells.end)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (index >= adev->mes.kernel_doorbells.start &&
> +	    index < adev->mes.kernel_doorbells.end)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (index >= adev->kfd.dev->kernel_doorbells.start &&
> +	    index < adev->kfd.dev->kernel_doorbells.end)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
> +}

Here you're excluding "end".

In patch 7 we see this:
> +	/* Last index in this object */
> +	uint32_t end;

Which implies that "end" is included, but in this patch, the code excludes it.
Perhaps you intended to use "index <= ...end" here?

Since this isn't RTL, wouldn't it be better to describe the doorbell instance,
with a "start" and "size"? This is traditionally used in memory management,
and it makes comparisons and checks easy.

Regards,
Luben


>  
>  /**
>   * amdgpu_mm_rdoorbell - read a doorbell dword
> @@ -37,7 +56,7 @@ u32 amdgpu_mm_rdoorbell(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index)
>  	if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
> +	if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>  		return readl(adev->doorbell.ptr + index);
>  	} else {
>  		DRM_ERROR("reading beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
> @@ -60,7 +79,7 @@ void amdgpu_mm_wdoorbell(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index, u32 v)
>  	if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
> +	if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>  		writel(v, adev->doorbell.ptr + index);
>  	} else {
>  		DRM_ERROR("writing beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
> @@ -81,7 +100,7 @@ u64 amdgpu_mm_rdoorbell64(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index)
>  	if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
> +	if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>  		return atomic64_read((atomic64_t *)(adev->doorbell.ptr + index));
>  	} else {
>  		DRM_ERROR("reading beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
> @@ -104,7 +123,7 @@ void amdgpu_mm_wdoorbell64(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index, u64 v)
>  	if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
> +	if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>  		atomic64_set((atomic64_t *)(adev->doorbell.ptr + index), v);
>  	} else {
>  		DRM_ERROR("writing beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
> @@ -157,6 +176,8 @@ int amdgpu_doorbell_alloc_page(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>  		return r;
>  	}
>  
> +	db_obj->start = amdgpu_doorbell_index_on_bar(adev, db_obj->bo, 0);
> +	db_obj->end = db_obj->start + db_obj->size / sizeof(u32);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list