[PATCH 10/16] drm/amdgpu: validate doorbell read/write
Shashank Sharma
shashank.sharma at amd.com
Thu Mar 30 14:37:53 UTC 2023
On 30/03/2023 16:34, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 2023-03-29 11:47, Shashank Sharma wrote:
>> This patch:
>> - updates start/end values for each of the doorbell object
>> created.
>> - adds a function which validates that the kernel doorbell read/write
>> is within this range.
>> - uses this function during doorbell writes from kernel.
>>
>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
>> Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav at amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c
>> index b46fe8b1378d..81713b2c28e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_doorbell_mgr.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,25 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>> +#include "kfd_priv.h"
>> +
>> +static inline
>> +bool amdgpu_doorbell_valid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index)
>> +{
>> + if (index >= adev->doorbell.kernel_doorbells.start &&
>> + index < adev->doorbell.kernel_doorbells.end)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (index >= adev->mes.kernel_doorbells.start &&
>> + index < adev->mes.kernel_doorbells.end)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + if (index >= adev->kfd.dev->kernel_doorbells.start &&
>> + index < adev->kfd.dev->kernel_doorbells.end)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
> Here you're excluding "end".
>
> In patch 7 we see this:
>> + /* Last index in this object */
>> + uint32_t end;
> Which implies that "end" is included, but in this patch, the code excludes it.
> Perhaps you intended to use "index <= ...end" here?
No, this is intended, same as array object calculation.
end = start + size;
max = start + size - 1
so (< end) not (<= end)
end says last index in this doorbell range;
- Shashank
>
> Since this isn't RTL, wouldn't it be better to describe the doorbell instance,
> with a "start" and "size"? This is traditionally used in memory management,
> and it makes comparisons and checks easy.
>
> Regards,
> Luben
>
>
>>
>> /**
>> * amdgpu_mm_rdoorbell - read a doorbell dword
>> @@ -37,7 +56,7 @@ u32 amdgpu_mm_rdoorbell(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index)
>> if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
>> + if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>> return readl(adev->doorbell.ptr + index);
>> } else {
>> DRM_ERROR("reading beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
>> @@ -60,7 +79,7 @@ void amdgpu_mm_wdoorbell(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index, u32 v)
>> if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>> return;
>>
>> - if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
>> + if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>> writel(v, adev->doorbell.ptr + index);
>> } else {
>> DRM_ERROR("writing beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
>> @@ -81,7 +100,7 @@ u64 amdgpu_mm_rdoorbell64(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index)
>> if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>> return 0;
>>
>> - if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
>> + if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>> return atomic64_read((atomic64_t *)(adev->doorbell.ptr + index));
>> } else {
>> DRM_ERROR("reading beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
>> @@ -104,7 +123,7 @@ void amdgpu_mm_wdoorbell64(struct amdgpu_device *adev, u32 index, u64 v)
>> if (amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access(adev))
>> return;
>>
>> - if (index < adev->doorbell.num_kernel_doorbells) {
>> + if (amdgpu_doorbell_valid(adev, index)) {
>> atomic64_set((atomic64_t *)(adev->doorbell.ptr + index), v);
>> } else {
>> DRM_ERROR("writing beyond doorbell aperture: 0x%08x!\n", index);
>> @@ -157,6 +176,8 @@ int amdgpu_doorbell_alloc_page(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> return r;
>> }
>>
>> + db_obj->start = amdgpu_doorbell_index_on_bar(adev, db_obj->bo, 0);
>> + db_obj->end = db_obj->start + db_obj->size / sizeof(u32);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list