[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/psp: mark securedisplay TA as optional

Michel Dänzer michel.daenzer at mailbox.org
Wed Apr 30 08:04:44 UTC 2025


On 2025-04-29 15:47, Alex Deucher wrote:
> This is an optional TA which is only available on
> certain embedded systems.  Mark it as optional to avoid
> user confusion.  This mirrors what we already do for
> other optional TAs.
> 
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4181
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> index d54bb13772622..1c843b888475e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> @@ -2214,7 +2214,8 @@ static int psp_securedisplay_initialize(struct psp_context *psp)
>  
>  	if (!psp->securedisplay_context.context.bin_desc.size_bytes ||
>  	    !psp->securedisplay_context.context.bin_desc.start_addr) {
> -		dev_info(psp->adev->dev, "SECUREDISPLAY: securedisplay ta ucode is not available\n");
> +		dev_info(psp->adev->dev,
> +			 "SECUREDISPLAY: optional securedisplay ta ucode is not available\n");
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  

Does it need to be dev_info, or could it be dev_dbg?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer       \        GNOME / Xwayland / Mesa developer
https://redhat.com             \               Libre software enthusiast


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list