[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/psp: mark securedisplay TA as optional
Michel Dänzer
michel.daenzer at mailbox.org
Wed Apr 30 08:04:44 UTC 2025
On 2025-04-29 15:47, Alex Deucher wrote:
> This is an optional TA which is only available on
> certain embedded systems. Mark it as optional to avoid
> user confusion. This mirrors what we already do for
> other optional TAs.
>
> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4181
> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> index d54bb13772622..1c843b888475e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> @@ -2214,7 +2214,8 @@ static int psp_securedisplay_initialize(struct psp_context *psp)
>
> if (!psp->securedisplay_context.context.bin_desc.size_bytes ||
> !psp->securedisplay_context.context.bin_desc.start_addr) {
> - dev_info(psp->adev->dev, "SECUREDISPLAY: securedisplay ta ucode is not available\n");
> + dev_info(psp->adev->dev,
> + "SECUREDISPLAY: optional securedisplay ta ucode is not available\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
Does it need to be dev_info, or could it be dev_dbg?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ GNOME / Xwayland / Mesa developer
https://redhat.com \ Libre software enthusiast
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list