[PATCH] Add glretrace option '--snapshot-format=MD5' that allow write image MD5 to a text format file.

Meng, Mengmeng mengmeng.meng at intel.com
Wed Oct 30 04:31:07 CET 2013


Oh, sorry. I make an error, MD5 should be faster than PNG . It should be:
MD5: Rendered 3435 frames in 143.251 secs, average of 23.9789 fps   md5.file 4K
PNG: Rendered 3435 frames in 478.734 secs, average of 7.17518 fps   png.file 1.7G

Thanks,
Meng


-----Original Message-----
From: apitrace-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:apitrace-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:23 AM
To: Meng, Mengmeng
Cc: Alexander Monakov; apitrace at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add glretrace option '--snapshot-format=MD5' that allow write image MD5 to a text format file.

Is that right?  md5sbeing 3x slower than (uncompressed?) .png files?
That your md5s don't match is a concern - Intel GPU and driver?
Does it help at all to throw away the least significant RGBA bits?

- Nigel

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Meng, Mengmeng <mengmeng.meng at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi, I do a test comparing MD5 with PNG, Open Arena at 800x600 on IVB
> MD5:  Rendered 3435 frames in 478.734 secs, average of 7.17518 fps  md5.file 4K
> PNG:  Rendered 3435 frames in 143.251 secs, average of 23.9789 fps   pnp.file 1.7G
>
> But there is a verification problem. It means that with the same 
> driver, MD5s are not all same between two tests. E.g. there are ~263 different frames in 3435 frames So we may consider "a threshold value"?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Meng
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: apitrace-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org 
> [mailto:apitrace-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Nigel 
> Stewart
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:48 PM
> To: Alexander Monakov
> Cc: Meng, Mengmeng; apitrace at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add glretrace option '--snapshot-format=MD5' that allow write image MD5 to a text format file.
>
> Alex,
>
> Sure, we can all happily agree about having clean and tidy patches for consideration.
>
> - Nigel
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras.ru> wrote:
>> Let's hear what more experienced (than myself) maintainers say.
>>
>> Regarding the patch itself, it should avoid adding irrelevant files 
>> in thirdparty (such as VS project files), and references to libcrypto 
>> should be removed from CMakeLists.txt.
>>
>> Alexander
> _______________________________________________
> apitrace mailing list
> apitrace at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/apitrace
_______________________________________________
apitrace mailing list
apitrace at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/apitrace


More information about the apitrace mailing list