Qt5

[José Fonseca]

Yes, I also struggled the first time to find the necessary Debian packages,
because Debian doesn't have one single meta package will all necessary to
build Qt5 apps.

I believe you
need libqt5webkit5-dev qtbase5-dev qtdeclarative5-dev qtquick1-5-dev

Jose



On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Lawrence Love <lawlove at gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies: I think my test build simply consisted of installing the
> available Qt5 on debian and then rebuilding master instead of the qt5
> branch. I'm now trying to build in the qt5 branch and am working on
> resolving this issue. FYI -Larry
>
>   CMake Warning at CMakeLists.txt:76 (find_package):
>   By not providing "FindQt5Widgets.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project
>   has asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by
>   "Qt5Widgets", but CMake did not find one.
>
>   Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5Widgets" with
>   any of the following names:
>
>     Qt5WidgetsConfig.cmake
>     qt5widgets-config.cmake
>
>   Add the installation prefix of "Qt5Widgets" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set
>   "Qt5Widgets_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files.  If
>   "Qt5Widgets" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it
> has
>   been installed.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:50 AM, José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Great.  Before I merge Qt5 I'll tag a new release, and then refer to it
>> from INSTALL.markdown.
>>
>> This release will be the last with Qt4 support.   And probably it will be
>> the last with support for tracing on Windows XP, as leveraging support for
>> __declspec(thread) TLS support in DLLs, which was introduced with Vista,
>> would simplify the code and probably speed up runtime performance too. And
>> given that Microsoft has stopped supporting XP I don't think it makes sense
>> for us to keep jumping through hoops to support it.
>>
>> We can probably keep support for replaying on XP longer without much
>> effort, as XP supports __declspec(thread) TLS in .EXEs.
>>
>> If anybody thinks differently let me know.
>>
>> Jose
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Lawrence Love <lawlove at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for the consideration (I've been away for a few weeks). I'm on
>>> debian
>>> and Qt 5 is available. I just now installed it and rebuilt with all my
>>> unsubmitted
>>> gui patches and everything looks good.
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> Larry
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Alexander Monakov <amonakov at ispras.ru>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 6 May 2014, José Fonseca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Unless there are concerns/objections I'll merge this one of these
>>>> days.
>>>>
>>>> No objection, but a slight concern: Lawrence (CC'ed) contributed some
>>>> GUI
>>>> patches recently, I suppose it would be nice to ask if installing Qt 5
>>>> is not
>>>> a problem for him (qt5 is not available in every distro yet).
>>>>
>>>> Another concern is that some of the users might be running
>>>> old/stable/lts
>>>> branches of distributions such as Debian stable or Ubuntu 12.04; such
>>>> users
>>>> will be unable to build the GUI after the merge.  Perhaps the README
>>>> could be
>>>> amended with a brief notice that in such situation people can checkout
>>>> an
>>>> older revision (e.g. the 5.0 tag) and build that instead of master?
>>>>
>>>> Alexander
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/apitrace/attachments/20140528/01e426d6/attachment.html>