[Authentication] Spec review (part 1)
Stef Walter
stefw at collabora.co.uk
Sun Feb 27 00:32:52 PST 2011
On 02/26/2011 11:33 PM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 09:14 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
>> On 01/30/2011 08:38 PM, Michael Leupold wrote:
>>>> So this leaves us with either:
>>>>
>>>> a) A "Type" property
>>>> b) An optional "Type" attribute
>>>> c) A "type" member in the Secret-struct
>>>>
>>>> I like a) for its simplicity, b) seems kinda awkward with the only
>>>> benefit being that you could search/filter items by type, c) seems to
>>>> be the cleanest solution. It provides consistency as you'd always
>>>> get/set the actual value and its type in one go. I'd be in favour of
>>>> c).
>>>>
>> How does the attached patch look?
> Ok, I took your changes into account inside ksecretservice sources.
That's great. I'll work on implementing them in gnome-keyring. I need to
figure out where to put this extra field in the old gnome-keyring file
format.
At some point we'll switch over to a fancy-schmancy new file format, but
we're not there yet.
Michael, do you have any comments on the patch?
Cheers,
Stef
More information about the Authentication
mailing list