[avahi] Re: [avahi-commits] r637 - /trunk/service-type-database/service-types

[Sebastien Estienne]

2005/9/30, Trent Lloyd <lathiat at bur.st>:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:47:52PM +0200, Sebastien Estienne wrote:
> > 2005/9/29, Marc Krochmal <marc at apple.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:15 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 27.09.05 22:07, Marc Krochmal (marc at apple.com) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>>> I'm also wondering what you mean by the comment that says dns-
> > > >>>> sd.org
> > > >>>> "is not a source that complies with the criterion".  The list on
> > > >>>> dns-
> > > >>>> sd.org doesn't really have a license because it's just a list of
> > > >>>> service types.  If you feel like you can't use this list, then I'm
> > > >>>> sure we'd be willing to slap a BSD style license header to the
> > > >>>> top of
> > > >>>> this page.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Yes, A BSD license would be nice for that. Does the list exist in a
> > > >>> form that is more easily parsed for generating a gdbm file?
> > > >>
> > > >> Yeah, we've had requests for this.  Just haven't gotten around to it
> > > >> yet.
> > > >
> > > > Do I have your informal assurance that it is OK if we integrate that
> > > > database into our software under a BSDish license right now? (no APSL
> > > > please!)
> > >
> > > I'm 99% sure that we'll be able to add the BSD header but I need to
> > > talk to Stuart first, and he's in Scotland this week.  Don't worry,
> > > no APSL.  I'll let you know.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >> I pretty much know nothing about RSS, but according to this site.
> > > >>
> > > >> <http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss>
> > > >>
> > > >> "The elements defined in this document are not themselves members of
> > > >> a namespace, so that RSS 2.0 can remain compatible with previous
> > > >> versions in the following sense -- a version 0.91 or 0.92 file is
> > > >> also a valid 2.0 file. If the elements of RSS 2.0 were in a
> > > >> namespace, this constraint would break, a version 0.9x file would not
> > > >> be a valid 2.0 file. "
> > > >>
> > > >> So it sounds like a client that understands RSS 2.0 feeds will also
> > > >> understand RSS 0.9.x feeds.  This means that older RSS clients
> > > >> browsing for "_rss" might discover newer 2.0 feeds that they wouldn't
> > > >> be able to parse.  I'll bet that if a customer came across a feed
> > > >> that they couldn't read, they would quickly replace their out-dated
> > > >> RSS client with a newer version, so this problem solves itself.
> > > >
> > > > Not quite. RSS2.0 doesn't pass validation with a RSS0.91 DTD. (And I
> > > > guess the other way around it is true too). Some RSS parsers do a DTD
> > > > validity check before processing the RSS data. (ideally all should)
> > > >
> > > >> Actually, it's "sftp-ssh".  The only reason we did that was because
> > > >> the IANA protocol list already had an "sftp", Simple File Transfer
> > > >> Protocol, so we had to pick something else.
> > > >>
> > > >> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers>
> > > >>
> > > >> We decided on "SFTP over SSH", or "sftp-ssh".  Similar sounding to
> > > >> "TCP over IP" or "TCP/IP".  I guess since RSS could use a different
> > > >> transport protocol, then it might make sense to call it "RSS over
> > > >> HTTP", "rss-http".
> > > >
> > > > Ok, I guess I could live with that.
> > >
> > > I talked to our RSS expert at Apple yesterday, and asked him if RSS
> > > has or would ever be transported over anything other than HTTP, and
> > > he didn't think so.  Obviously he can't tell the future, but assuming
> > > for the time being it will mostly only ever be used over HTTP, then
> > > I'm thinking we could even go with "_rss._tcp" and "_atom._tcp".  He
> > > also suggested that we could deal with the version issue by
> > > specifying the version in the TXT record.  For example, we could have
> > > "path091" and "path20" for example, and each one could point to a
> > > feed in the corresponding format.
> > >
> > i agree that using TXT record to handle the RSS versions may be a good solution
> >
>
> While you can specify your version, you can't then publish more than 1
> version
you can :
_rss._tcp "sebest's blog" 8000 path09=/rss-0.9/feed.xml path20=/rss-2/feed.xml

>
> Trent
>
> > > Something to consider...
> > >
> > > -Marc
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > avahi mailing list
> > > avahi at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastien Estienne
> > _______________________________________________
> > avahi mailing list
> > avahi at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
>
> --
> Trent Lloyd <lathiat at bur.st>
> Bur.st Networking Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> avahi mailing list
> avahi at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/avahi
>


--
Sebastien Estienne