[Cairo] virtualizing the surface interface
Carl Worth
cworth at east.isi.edu
Sat Sep 27 07:07:11 PDT 2003
On Sep 27, James Henstridge wrote:
> How about cairo_surface_class_t ? It sounds like the "impl" struct
> essentially defines a class of surfaces (in the object oriented
> sense).
The problem with that is that then I would naturally use:
cairo_surface_class_t *class;
at which point I start feeling like I'm setting myself up for
complaints from a C++ user about "class" being a reserved word.
-Carl
More information about the cairo
mailing list