[Cairo] virtualizing the surface interface

[James Henstridge]

On 27/09/03 22:07, Carl Worth wrote:

>On Sep 27, James Henstridge wrote:
> > How about cairo_surface_class_t ?  It sounds like the "impl" struct 
> > essentially defines a class of surfaces (in the object oriented
> > sense).
>
>The problem with that is that then I would naturally use:
>
>	cairo_surface_class_t *class;
>
>at which point I start feeling like I'm setting myself up for
>complaints from a C++ user about "class" being a reserved word.
>  
>
That would only be a problem in the header file though, right?  Some 
possibilities for variable/struct field names could be "surface_class", 
"klass", "class_".  There shouldn't be any problems in the main source 
files though.

James.

-- 
Email: james at daa.com.au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/